ntroduction. Toward an Integrated Research Paradigm for Psychiatry During the twentieth century, the field of psychiatry and mental health disciplines experienced what Kenneth Kendler (2005) rightly called the battle of paradigms. At the start of the last century, psychiatry was just establishing itself as a medical branch and as a discipline, especially in the German-speaking world. Among others, Kraepelin, Bleuler, and even Freud were discussing which etiopathogenic principles should organize the nascent psychiatry. As George Makari convincingly shown in his book Revolution in Mind: The Creation of Psychoanalysis (2008), psychoanaly- sis was, among other things, the proposal that Freud and his group made to the academic world in response to the question of what mental disease is, what causes it, what its mechanisms of production are, and how it should be treated. The story that followed is well-known. During the twentieth century, the rejection by aca- demia of unconscious mental processes and of the notion that it is also possible to become ill due to biographical reasons led to the development of psychoanalysis as an independent hermeneutic discipline, which sought to become epistemologically autonomous. However, the illusion of autarky has resulted in a psychoanalysis that is isolated from natural science and the rest of the disciplines of the mind. This situ- ation may have been inevitable, given that even though Freud never abandoned the idea that the mind and brain are two sides of the same coin and that at some point we would eventually discover drugs that could modify pathological behavior,
چکیده فارسی
مقدمه. به سوی یک الگوی پژوهشی یکپارچه برای روانپزشکی در طول قرن بیستم، رشته های روانپزشکی و سلامت روان چیزی را تجربه کردند که کنت کندلر (2005) به درستی آن را نبرد پارادایم ها نامید. در آغاز قرن گذشته، روانپزشکی در حال تثبیت خود به عنوان یک شاخه پزشکی و به عنوان یک رشته بود، به ویژه در جهان آلمانی زبان. در میان دیگران، کریپلین، بلولر، و حتی فروید در حال بحث بودند که کدام اصول بیماری زا باید روانپزشکی نوپا را سازماندهی کند. همانطور که جورج ماکاری در کتاب خود انقلاب در ذهن: خلقت روانکاوی (2008) به طور قانع کننده ای نشان داد، روانکاوی از جمله پیشنهادی بود که فروید و گروهش در پاسخ به این سوال که چه بیماری روانی به جهان دانشگاهی ارائه کردند. این است که چه چیزی باعث آن می شود، مکانیسم های تولید آن چیست و چگونه باید درمان شود. داستانی که بعد از آن معروف است. در طول قرن بیستم، رد فرایندهای ذهنی ناخودآگاه توسط دانشگاه و این تصور که ممکن است به دلایل زندگینامه ای نیز بیمار شویم، منجر به توسعه روانکاوی به عنوان یک رشته هرمنوتیک مستقل شد که در پی آن بود که از نظر معرفت شناختی خودمختار شود. با این حال، توهم خودکامگی منجر به روانکاوی شده است که از علوم طبیعی و بقیه رشته های ذهنی جدا شده است. با توجه به اینکه فروید هرگز این ایده را که ذهن و مغز دو روی یک سکه هستند و اینکه در نقطهای از زمان ما در نهایت داروهایی را کشف میکنیم که میتوانند رفتار آسیبشناختی را تغییر دهند، کشف کنیم، اجتنابناپذیر بوده است.
ادامه ...
بستن ...
ntroduction. Toward an Integrated Research Paradigm for Psychiatry During the twentieth century, the field of psychiatry and mental health disciplines experienced what Kenneth Kendler (2005) rightly called the battle of paradigms. At the start of the last century, psychiatry was just establishing itself as a medical branch and as a discipline, especially in the German-speaking world. Among others, Kraepelin, Bleuler, and even Freud were discussing which etiopathogenic principles should organize the nascent psychiatry. As George Makari convincingly shown in his book Revolution in Mind: The Creation of Psychoanalysis (2008), psychoanaly- sis was, among other things, the proposal that Freud and his group made to the academic world in response to the question of what mental disease is, what causes it, what its mechanisms of production are, and how it should be treated. The story that followed is well-known. During the twentieth century, the rejection by aca- demia of unconscious mental processes and of the notion that it is also possible to become ill due to biographical reasons led to the development of psychoanalysis as an independent hermeneutic discipline, which sought to become epistemologically autonomous. However, the illusion of autarky has resulted in a psychoanalysis that is isolated from natural science and the rest of the disciplines of the mind. This situ- ation may have been inevitable, given that even though Freud never abandoned the idea that the mind and brain are two sides of the same coin and that at some point we would eventually discover drugs that could modify pathological behavior,
ادامه ...
بستن ...